This paper examines the global implications of policy borrowing, employing case examples of Chinese school systems, which enjoy the success of grafting new identities to improve education. The paper comments on contemporary scholars’ use of identity grafting theory (Lee in Managing Chineseness: identity and ethnic management in Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2017) to generate insights on how schools, teachers and students engaged educational change in mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. Scholars presented empirical findings by using identity grafting constructs to explain education stakeholders’ diverse responses to change: (1) born-again—rejecting change by reviving traditional practices; (2) repression—repressing traditional identities instead of embracing change; (3) integration—combining traditional identities and progressive change to achieve a balance; and (4) situationalism—developing new identities that transcend boundaries between traditional identities and progressive change. The scholars contributed research that advances the theorization of identity grafting. First, rising born-again Chinese sentiments seek to reject the imposition of a singular Chinese identity imposed by state governments. Born-again Chineseness no longer singularly focuses on defending traditional identities against Western influences. Second, a better understanding is achieved on identity repression—change resistance results from a displaced focus on repressing traditional identities. Third, the prevalence of identity integration strategies can be explained by intensive policy borrowing in the region. Policy borrowers need to ensure externally imposed identities are represented to overcome challenges generated by identity grafting strategies that impede progressive change. This popularity of integrationist strategies accounts for the challenges in achieving identity situationalism—policy borrowing needs culturally divisive identity markers that provide clear indicators to

This paper examines the unintended consequences of state language policy and planning (LPP) that adopt subtractive approaches on teachers' subsequent receptivity to policy fine-tuning. A comparative approach is adopted in this statistical study of two strategic contexts, where the influence of the world's two leading languages—English and Mandarin—manifests in the home language conversion patterns of ethnic Chinese teachers of Hong Kong and Singapore. The interplay among state, education, and family linguistic domains provides the framework to understand how teachers exercise agency underpinned by their sociolinguistic background (childhood home language—CHL) and home language conversion preference (home language as adult—HL). The results show that teacher CHL–HL conversion preferences underlie their response to state LPP initiatives and influence LPP outcomes in the education domain. The results are theorized in terms of the prevailing values in Hong Kong and Singapore that shape teacher agency, the unintended outcomes of subtractive LPP in education, and the probable outcomes on the linguistic vitality of local and dominant languages in Hong Kong, with the interplay between future subtractive LPP and teacher agency. Copyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

我國於2019年提出《粵港澳大灣區發展規劃綱要》(簡稱《規劃綱要》)方案，提出九個城市以及香港和澳門特別行政區作為區域發展的核心引擎，並藉著這些核心城市和港澳地區的發展，帶動周邊城市和區域的發展。從區域教育發展以及國際趨勢等角度來看，粵港澳大灣區的人才發展宜具有國家及區域意識及國際視野，宜注重科技與人文雙重取向；鼓勵粵港澳學校合作交流，共建院校研究基地；樹立多元化灣區教育合作理念，在科研、教育、經濟發展和人才培養等方面達至協同共贏效果。 China put forward the "Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area" in 2019, proposing nine cities and Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative Regions as the core engines for regional development, promoting as well the growth of the surrounding cities and regions. Through the analysis of regional education development and international trends, this paper discusses personnel training in the Greater Bay Area. The development of talents in this Area should have both a national and regional awareness and an international perspective, and be oriented towards both humanities and science and technology. Cooperation and exchanges between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao schools should be encouraged, so as to build joint research centers among institutions. A diversified concept of educational cooperation should be established to achieve win-win results in scientific research, education, economic development and personnel training. Copyright © 2020 河北師範大學.

Effective teaching is a key factor in educational effectiveness and improvement. To facilitate the knowledge exchange regarding effective teaching in secondary education internationally, there has been a growing interest in using classroom observation measures. However, little is known regarding the comparability of observation measures across various national contexts (measurement invariance). Consequently, comparing effective teaching behaviour across contexts is compromised by issues of construct and measurement equivalence. In the present study, we investigated measurement invariance of the International Comparative Analysis of Learning and Teaching (ICALT) for measuring teaching behaviour across various national contexts including the Netherlands, South Korea, South Africa, Indonesia, Hong Kong-China, and Pakistan. Results showed that ICALT indicates full strict invariance in four out of the six countries, which provides a possibility to compare teaching behaviour in the Netherlands, South Korea, South Africa, and Indonesia. South Korea indicated the highest quality of teaching behaviour, while Indonesia indicated the lowest. Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

粵港澳大灣區項目,在針對教育方面的內容,皆在十九大報告、習近平視察廣東重要講話、兩會中所提及並有所強調。本文主要闡述了灣區在教育建設方面的重要性及其意義,並結合國外三大灣區的特點,對粵港澳大灣區教育建設提出各方面改進措施及建議。

《粵港澳大灣區發展規劃綱要》強調推動粵港澳高校教育合作發展,這為廣東高校留學生教育發展帶來新一輪戰略機遇期。在"一帶一路"倡議的大背景下,文章結合當前廣東高校留學生教育發展的現狀,分析了粵港澳大灣區建設下廣東高校發展留學生教育的優勢,立足區域優勢互補的原則,立足高校合作共贏的理念,提出一系列切實可行的發展對策。以期廣東高校能牢牢把握這次契機,發揮政策優勢,謀求自身發展,推動留學生教育發展,提升高校整體國際化辦學水平。

從當前城市群的布局和產業優勢來看,粵港澳大灣區應當堅持多中心的發展定位。作為為城市和產業提供主要人才支撐的粵港澳大灣區高等教育集群,其發展路徑應當與大灣區多中心的發展定位相符。多中心的發展定位對高等教育集群的挑戰主要集中於兩大層面——創新與協同。融合創新理論主張以多要素的"組合"達至創新,粵港澳大灣區高等教育集群應當發揮"區域""人才培養""社會服務""體制機制"等要素的組合優勢,走融合創新之路應對挑戰。一是推進"區域+體制機制"的融合創新,高等教育配合區域分工進行錯位發展,並建立共同體合作機制,支撐多中心的城市群發展定位。二是推進"區域+人才培養+社會服務"的融合創新,支撐多中心的產業群發展定位:高水平大學走"開放式創新"之路,主要與珠江東岸的科創業和金融業同頻共振;應用型本科和高職院校走產教融合創新之路,主要為珠江西岸制造業提供堅實支持。

粵港澳大灣區建設已上升到國家發展戰略層面。灣區教育、人才等要素的互融互通和協同發展,是實現粵港澳大灣區發展目標的基礎性條件。找準粵港澳大灣區在教育和人才合作層面的支持條件及現存問題,明確粵港澳大灣區教育和人才合作機制建設過程中錯位發展與優勢互補相統一;充分發揮市場機制的決定性作用,同時,積極發揮政府的引領作用;打造教育與人才合作創新與交流平台;完善教育、人才的激勵措施,搭建創新知識與科技成果轉化機制,有利於整合區域優勢,提升灣區整體國際競爭力,促進國際一流灣區目標的達成。