A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work

A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work

• Kember, David Chinese University of Hong Kong
• McKay, Jan Curtin University, Australia
• Sinclair, Kit Hong Kong Polytechnic University
• Wong, Frances Kam Yuet Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 369-379, 2008

Routledge

2008

• L Educational Measurement & Evaluation
  • LA Intelligence, Ability & Aptitude Tests

Critical Thinking Critical & Persuasive Writing Writing Thought & Thinking Problem-Based Learning Reflective Learning Psychological Aspects

• Hong Kong

• 1997.7 onwards

• Post-Secondary Education

Where courses have as an aim the promotion of reflective practice, it will enhance the achievement of the goal if the level of reflective thinking is assessed. To do this in a satisfactory way requires a reliable protocol for assessing the level of reflection in written work. This article presents a protocol that can be used to guide the allocation of work to four categories, namely: habitual action/non-reflection, understanding, reflection, and critical reflection. Intermediate categories can also be used. Detailed descriptors of each category to guide the process are provided. The protocol was tested by four assessors independently using it to grade a set of written work, and very good agreement was obtained.
[Copyright of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is the property of Routledge. Full article may be available at the publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293355]

• English

Journal Articles

• 02602938

• 10.1080/02602930701293355

https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/en/bibs/739e0d68

2010-11-24