Journal Articles
Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application
- Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application
- International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 66-82, 2012
- Athabasca University
- 2012
-
- Hong Kong
- China
- Macau
- Malaysia
-
- 1997.7 onwards
-
- Post-Secondary Education
- E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of e-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of e-learning courses. This paper constructs a four-phase evaluation model for e-learning courses, which includes planning, development, process, and product evaluation, called the PDPP evaluation model. Planning evaluation includes market demand, feasibility, target student group, course objectives, and finance. Development evaluation includes instructional design, course material design, course Web site design, flexibility, student-student interaction, teacher/tutor support, technical support, and assessment. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. Using the PDPP model as a research framework, a purely e-learning course on Research Methods in Distance Education, developed by the School of Professional and Continuing Education at the University of Hong Kong (HKU SPACE) and jointly offered with the School of Distance Learning for Medical Education of Peking University (SDLME, PKU) was used as a case study. Sixty students from mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Malaysia were recruited for this course. According to summative evaluation through a student e-learning experience survey, the majority of students were very satisfied/satisfied on all e-learning dimensions of this course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, student-centred learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic PDPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the PDPP evaluation model and its application can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider e-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.[Copyright of International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning is the property of Athabasca University.Access via Directory of Open Access Journals: http://www.irrodl.org/]
-
- English
- Journal Articles
-
- 14923831
- https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/bibs/1232452e
- 2014-01-18
Recent Journal Articles
Researching L2 investment in EMI courses: Techno-reflective narrative interviewsJournal Articles
Technostress and English language teaching in the age of generative AIJournal Articles
Playfulness and kindergarten children's academic skills: Executive functions and creative thinking processes as mediators?Journal Articles
Teaching EFL students to write with ChatGPT: Students' motivation to learn, cognitive load, and satisfaction with the learning processJournal Articles
Revamping an English for specific academic purposes course for problem-based learning: Reflections from course developersJournal Articles
Contrasting mathematics educational values: An in-depth case study of primary and secondary teachers in Hong KongJournal Articles
Cross-disciplinary challenges: Navigating power dynamics in advocating an entrepreneurial STEM curriculumJournal Articles
An exploration of microlearning as continuous professional development for English language teachers: Initial findings and insightsJournal Articles