The book aims to explore distributed leadership in developing curriculum innovations in schools with a target of bringing about theoretical underpinnings in the West with the empirical studies and practices in the East. It examines theoretically the roots of the curriculum leadership studies and practically with the empirical data and case studies in Hong Kong which has been considered a melting pot of the Western concepts and innovations in a land of Eastern cultures. The examination is framed within theoretical frameworks of activity theories, discourse analysis and social network systems. The findings will show the impact of the cultural traditions of Eastern countries in the mediation of the direction of the discourses in teacher meetings and the effectiveness of decision making in the processes of developing school based curriculum leadership. The book is theoretically exploratory with practically examined practices for educational leaders like schools headers and department leaders as well as teachers who aim at asserting greater influence in the educational decision making processes. Topics discussed in the book include: • Curriculum leadership functions and patterns of leadership distribution • Engaging teachers in reflective practice: tensions between ideological orientations and pragmatic considerations • Models of distributed leadership: focus, development and future • Initiating, designing and enacting curriculum innovations: procedures and processes This book will appeal to researchers interested in Curriculum Studies, School leadership and comparative education. Those who studies the theory of education and Asian education will also find this book valuable.
[Copyright © 2017 Edmond Hau-fai Law.]

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the complex, intricate relationships between the central (intended) curriculum, teachers’ perceived curriculums, and the enacted/assessed curriculum in classroom contexts. To do this, the authors have used Hong Kong’s new core senior-secondary liberal studies (LS) curriculum as a case study, with a special focus on its key pedagogical component – inquiry teaching/learning. Design/methodology/approach: This study’s objects are two teachers (from two local schools), each with a LS teacher’s education. Documentary analysis, lesson observation, and focus interviews were used to triangulate data for interpretation and analysis. Findings: The findings illuminate: how LS teachers’ perceptions of inquiry teaching/learning relate to and align with the advocacy embodied in the intended curriculum, the relationships between teachers’ perceptions and practices of inquiry learning and teaching, and how this aspect of the intended curriculum reform can be made more relevant to the classroom context. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the under-researched area of curriculum gaps and (mis)alignments in Hong Kong’s LS curriculum reform.
[Copyright © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited.]

「小學統整課程示例計劃」是由香港教育學院資助進行的特殊計劃，目標在於推動香港小學統整課程的發展。該計劃透過參與的六所學校推行小一至小六共六套的統整課程，獲取寶貴的實踐經驗以作交流及推廣，旨在提供一個可行方案的初稿，供香港的學校按照本身的校本條件，參考課程內容作出修訂調動或增潤，並自行發展合適的校本課程。上述計劃邀請所有曾參與學習六套統整課程的三百二十九位小一至小三的學生及二百七十二位小四至小六的學生填寫問卷。本文透過問卷調查的結果探討香港小學生對課程統整的見解，並以下列三個重點 作出討論、分析和建議：（一)學生的學習態度、(二)學生的學習策略及（三〉學生的學習表現。

Hong Kong has been considered as one of the world’s best performing school systems. Among the six factors attributing to the success of the educational system, three are related to decentralization of pedagogical decision-making and empowerment of school leadership and teachers. Teachers’ voices and their wisdom in decision-making processes in schools has become a prominent topic among policy makers and educators. In the last 40 years, international literature suggests that teacher leadership practices in school-based curriculum development (SBCD) as a form of school capacity building enhances teachers’ empowerment and their professional capabilities, which in turn may result in more effective student learning. This chapter reports a portion of the findings based on the interview data of a case study of school-based curriculum leadership in an elementary school in Hong Kong in 2007. The study adopted a design-based approach. Participating teachers engaged in cycles of planning the objectives of learning, experimenting on redesigning the lesson plans, and reflecting on practice lessons. Multiple data collection methods were adopted. Our findings show that a systematic approach in organizing curriculum development activities based on problem-solving approaches and a distributed leadership style among teachers can be effective in enhancing teacher learning in both curriculum leadership skills and powerful learning.

採納宏觀視角回顧香港課程與學校改革的軌跡，力圖從改革內容切入，深入分析學校領導素質、學校轉型資本、校長角色、"教師中心"抑或"學生中心"等幾個關鍵問題。
[Copyright © 2012北京教育學院.]

很多學者（例如：Stenhouse，1975；Altrichter，Posch & Somekh，1993）認為學校課程的優劣，是取決於教師對參與改善教學的行動研究的程度。這個說法，在香港的小學教育裡，有必要被重新驗證。原因是，香港的小學設有「小學課程統籌主任」一職，其主要職責是帶領校內教師提升學與教和評估的策略。這些「課程領導」需要發揮變革者的角色，而他們所引進的行動研究，則被視為優化學校課程的工具。正如課程發展議會於2002年發表的《基礎教育課程指引》中，明確建議「以協作行動研究模式作為教師專業發展及校本課程發展的轉變策略」。換言之，評定香港小學課程發展的準則，很大程度上是取決於課程領導如何演譯這工具、如何發揮其功用，及他們如何感知其中的價值和意義。此座談會將從此角度出發，透過三位課程領導親身表述他們所推行的不同層面 和範疇的校本行動研究工作，及其後的反思，從而探討對香港小學課程發展的啟示。