本文從四個方面比較了中國內地與香港高校學生事務管理的異同。在管理結構方面，內地、香港分別屬於「遞階型」結構和「單一型」結構，存在明顯的不同；在管理職能方面，相同之處有三，不同之處有二；在管理方法上，內地、香港分別實施「民主集中」式管理和「民主法制」式管理，各有利弊不同；上述三方面又造成了學生事務管理效果的不同。通過以上比較和分析，提出五條改進兩地高校學生事務管理的建議。The paper compares the similarities and differences between the systems of University Student Affairs Management in mainland China and Hong Kong in four areas. In terms of organizational structures, mainland China adopts a hierarchical structure that distinguishes itself clearly from the more monotype structure in Hong Kong. In terms of administrative functions, there are three similarities and two differences. With the modes of management, the system on the Mainland has characteristic of "democracy combined with centralization? while in Hong Kong there is a form of "democracy plus legal practice," both of which have their own advantages and disadvantages. All these differences in turn lead to further differences in Student Affairs Management. Based on the above comparisons and analyses, the paper puts forward five suggestions for improving the University Student Affairs Management systems on the Mainland and in Hong Kong.[Copyright of Journal of Youth Studies is the property of The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups at http://yrc.hkfyg.org.hk/]
