Journal Articles
The effect of coded focused and unfocused corrective feedback on ESL student writing accuracy
- The effect of coded focused and unfocused corrective feedback on ESL student writing accuracy
- Journal of Language and Education, 8(4), 36-57, 2022
- National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
- 2022
-
- Hong Kong
-
- 1997.7 onwards
-
- Unknown or Unspecified
- Purpose: This study adopted a mixed-method approach, including a classroom experiment and 24 in-depth interviews, to investigate the effects of two feedback techniques (coded focused and unfocused written corrective feedback) on ESL learners' writing in a self-financed tertiary institution in Hong Kong. Methodology: Three intact classes of 47 students served as the experimental and control groups; the control group only received feedback on content and organization, whereas the two experimental groups also received focused and unfocused linguistic feedback, respectively. The feedback intervention was conducted over an eight-week intensive summer course, focusing on three grammar errors (articles, singular/plural nouns and verb forms). Altogether, students wrote seven pieces, four of which were analysed for the present research. Results: The study found that students who received focused written corrective feedback (WCF) significantly outperformed the other two groups, though the effects varied across error types. Meanwhile, no significant differences were found between the unfocused and control groups. In-depth interviews explored how individual learners' metalinguistic understanding and engagement affect their intake of WCF. The results revealed that learners who received focused feedback developed a deeper understanding of the linguistic nature of specific error types. Learners with limited English proficiency were less likely to apply their linguistic knowledge to revise a task or write a new one. Conclusion: Because not all errors deserve equal attention, teachers and students should consider how feedback can be used more effectively, particularly in areas where comprehensive feedback is considered obligatory. When teaching students with limited language proficiency, it is recommended that, rather than providing a wide range of error corrections, teachers provide focused feedback complemented with carefully designed metalinguistic support. Copyright © 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics. All rights reserved.
-
- English
- Journal Articles
-
- 24117390
- https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/en/bibs/502a1544
- 2023-08-10
Recent Journal Articles
在香港幼稚園推行STEM (科學、科技、工程及數學)教育的挑戰之初探Journal Articles
Whole-day or half-day kindergarten? Chinese parents' perceptions, needs, and decisions in a privatised marketplaceJournal Articles
Voices without words: Doing critical literate talk in English as a second languageJournal Articles
Using the genre-based approach in teaching chinese written composition to South Asian ethnic minority students in Hong KongJournal Articles
Translanguaging as dynamic activity flows in CLIL classroomsJournal Articles
Does obesity persist from childhood to adolescence? A 4-year prospective cohort study of Chinese students in Hong KongJournal Articles
Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept + Language Mapping”Journal Articles
Examining the role of institutional agents and school-based social capital in minority university choice and accessJournal Articles