Conference Papers
Project learning as 'soft' curriculum policy: Policy influences on teachers' implementation of education reforms in Hong Kong
- Project learning as 'soft' curriculum policy: Policy influences on teachers' implementation of education reforms in Hong Kong
- 2005
- Faculty of Education of CUHK 40th Anniversary International Conference: Developing Teacher Leadership and Education Partnership in the Face of Education Reform (2005: The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
-
- Hong Kong
-
- 1997.7 onwards
-
- Unknown or Unspecified
- After the handover, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government implemented drastic and enormous curriculum reforms, including project learning as one of the four key tasks. Over 80% of Hong Kong primary and secondary schools have adopted project learning as a curriculum task, which signifies the importance of teacher’s role and attitude in curriculum implementation. Yet the pressures on teachers and schools to achieve this result should not be underestimated. In this paper, the concept of “soft” and “hard” policy will be introduced as a means of analyzing the issues facing teachers in implementing the education reforms. “Soft” policy is characterized by persuasion, benchmarking and best practice exemplars. “Hard” policy on the other hand is explicitly embedded in legislation and budgetary allocations. This article will analyse the characteristics of project learning as a “soft” curriculum policy. It possesses features such as being practical, adaptable to context, emphasizing teaching processes, capable of being led from the classroom and is characterized by flexibility. Great emphasis is placed on conferences, seminars, sharing exemplars to promote and encourage teachers to work on this reform. On the other hand, however, the government uses “hard” means to monitor school compliance with the reforms. Thus, school self evaluation and external school evaluation are used to assess the extent to which schools are implementing curriculum innovations such as project learning. There are thus twin pressures on teachers and schools caused by the use of both “hard” and “soft” policy instruments.
- Paper presented at Faculty of Education of CUHK 40th Anniversary International Conference: Developing Teacher Leadership and Education Partnership in the Face of Education Reform.
-
- English
- Conference Papers
- https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/bibs/bd064044
- 2015-01-23
Recent Conference Papers
Enhancing students’ positive life values and well-beingConference Papers
Exploring the role of team-based e-assessment in teaching Chinese as a second language: A perspective of pedagogical design in an international primary school in Hong KongConference Papers
Effects of experience on pre-service kindergarten teachers' attitudes toward the implementation of inclusive education in the Hong Kong vocational education contextConference Papers
Understanding gifted students’ self-assessment of career adaptability in Hong Kong: A Rasch analysis of the psychometric properties of CAAS-SFConference Papers
香港中文准教師沉浸課程的跨學科學習Conference Papers
Helping teachers to teach with corpora: The Corpus-Aided Platform for Language Teachers (CAP)Conference Papers
Problematising the Global North/South binaries: A critical review of the sociological literature of education of ethnic minority students in Hong KongConference Papers
The efficacy of educational apps for teaching in the humanities: Adopting the PICRAT modelConference Papers