As many educational institutions move education online, educators have found it difficult to use such environments to their advantage. E-leaning environments offer the potential to take teaching and learning beyond the four walls of the classroom where learning can be based on real-world problems and learners become active participants in constructing their own learning. The paper describes a process used with 65 Hong Kong teachers to develop e-learning projects that use computer-based learning resources; linked with networked communities of peers and others in online collaborations in and beyond the classroom while accessing information that goes beyond the textbook. It was found that once the process of learning was understood from its many perspectives, and the critical selection of strategies to ensure learning takes place, teachers could reflect on their own pedagogical practice in creating, maintaining and working in such e-learning environments applying to their own practice.

Creating, maintaining and working in e-learning environments is challenging and to date there has been little evaluation of the quality of such learning environments where educators are able to receive feedback on student's perceptions and adjust their learning environments accordingly. Current research, reported in this paper, looks at the use of an online survey instrument for evaluating e-learning environments. The instrument has been used in a number of learning environments, and in different countries with secondary and tertiary students in Australia, Hong Kong and Taiwan. The resultant statistics depict the actual and preferred learning environment of individuals and groups of learners giving valuable feedback to educators working in these environments. A number of examples are given to illustrate how educators can gather this data to evaluate the effectiveness of the e-learning environment. Adjustments can then be made accordingly to improve or adjust the learning environment.

The research reported in this paper used the Online Learning Environment Survey (OLES) as a tool to evaluate e-learning environments. Data gathered from university classes in Hong Kong using blended e-learning were used to illustrate the value of OLES in helping educators reflect on the online learning environment provided for students. Comments from interviews were used to verify the data gathered online. OLES was found to be a valuable instrument for gathering data to help educators reflect on what had worked or what might be improved in their classes. These educators were also able to see the extent to which the actual experiences of students in the module matched their preferred online learning environment.
[Copyright of Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ascilite) at http://www.ascilite.org.au]

This paper reports on the findings from research that uses a tool to help educators assess their e-learning environment. The Online Learning Environment Survey (OLES) instrument was developed using online technologies, including a web-based survey format and an SQL database where the data is instantly captured, analysed and viewed via the data screen or the charting screen. This makes the instrument very easy to use and the results can be viewed immediately providing educators using e-learning with a mechanism to adjust their teaching and enhance the learning environment. The OLES survey was administered during 2004 and the data from three case study classes using e-learning in Hong Kong are presented. Qualitative data from the interviews was used to verify the data gathered and are discussed with regard to the support needed by educators who are developing and teaching in e-learning environments as a method to improve the quality of the e-learning environment through constructive solutions.
[Copyright of Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) at http://www.aare.edu.au]

Evaluations suggest that, within construction related professional courses, technical aspects are the most difficult to teach. This is particularly evident in the teaching of architectural students as many fail to make the link between Construction Technology and the main thrust of architectural education: the Design Studio. The teaching of Construction Technology has, until now, been very much an instructor centred, didactic exercise with little interaction among students or between students. In sharp contrast, Design Studio is dependent on the visual and graphical processes and occurs in settings where students interact informally with their peers and design tutors. If Design Studio can be managed in a student centred and hands on environment, why can't courses in Construction Technology / Tectonics be delivered in a similar atmosphere? This was the challenge faced by the project team as they undertook a project in changing practice through innovative teaching in Construction Technology at The University of Hong Kong. This paper reports on the process and progress of this project where there has been an attempt to shift the pedagogical practices in Tectonics. Changes in students' learning of Tectonics, the issues associated with collaboration between instructors and students, between instructors & instructors and across departments are discussed.
[Copyright of Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ascilite) at http://www.ascilite.org.au]