Patients' socioeconomic status and their evaluations of primary care in Hong Kong

Patients' socioeconomic status and their evaluations of primary care in Hong Kong

• Owolabi, Onikepe Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
• Zhang, Zhen Zhen School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Wei, Xiao Lin School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Yang, Nan School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Li, Hai Tao School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Wong, Samuel Y. S. School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Wong, Martin C. S. School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Yip, Winnie Dept. of Public Health, Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust, Oxford, UK
• Griffiths, Sian M. School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong

BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 487-497, 2013

Great Britain

BioMed Central Ltd.

2013

• N 學生與學生服務
  • NE 學生健康、學生輕生 / 自殺事件、學童保健服務辦法
• A 人的成長與發展
  • AE 社會經濟差異、文化差異、階級和家庭背景

Primary Care Socioeconomic Factors PCAT Medical Sciences

• Hong Kong

• 1997.7 onwards

• 學前教育
• 小學教育

• View Full Text 全文連結

Background: Strengthening primary care is key to Hong Kong's ongoing health system reform. Primary care remains unregulated, private sector dominated and financed mainly out-of-pocket. This study sought to examine the association between patients' socioeconomic status (SES), source of health payments and the quality of primary care they accessed to inform policy discussions. Methods: Data was collected from 1,994 respondents in a stratified random telephone survey with a 68% response rate, using the validated primary care assessment tool (PCAT). Education, household-income and type of housing were selected as indicators of SES. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models were created to examine associations between indicators of SES and scores of quality. Results: Higher household-income was most significantly associated with better experiences of quality. Respondents with HK$ 15000-39999(USD1934-5158) and HK$ 40000(USD5159) and above were 47%(OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.96) and 2 times (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.38-3.09) more likely to experience better quality than the lowest-income group respectively. Income group HK$ 40000(USD5159) and above was 84% more likely to have better utilization (OR 1.84, 95% CI(1.21-2.78), and 2 times more likely to receive better comprehensiveness (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.26-2.87). Patients who used only private insurance were 80%(OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.20-2.68) more likely to experience better quality than those who paid out-of-pocket. Conclusions: Our results show that the quality of primary care experienced in HK tended to be higher for those who had higher income and private insurance, and were able to pay out-of-pocket for the care. This indicated that the inequality in primary care is likely to be related with the private dominated primary care system in Hong Kong. More public responsibility on primary health care should be sought for in HK and similar contexts to reduce the inequality in primary care.
[Copyright of BMC Health Services Research. Full article may be available at the publisher's website:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-487]

• 英文

期刊論文

• 14726963

• 10.1186/1472-6963-13-487

https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/tc/bibs/9c9d2688

2014-05-29