Recent education reform in Hong Kong has been largely based on the premise that the motivation of many secondary school students is lacking. However, the empirical base underlying this premise is weak. This study explored the development of students' academic motivation in secondary schools. It improved on the previous Hong Kong research in terms of the representativeness of sample and depth of enquiry. Mastery, performance-approach, social status, social approval, social affiliation, social concern, extrinsic, and prospects goals were examined. They were measured by a Chinese version of Inventory of School Motivation Revised. The participants were initially 354 S1 and 343 S3 students from three secondary schools with ability bands ranging from 1 to 3. A year later, 176 S6 students of the schools were also included in the sample. The one-year longitudinal changes (for the then S2 and S4 students) and grade-level differences (between the S2, S4, and S6 students) in goal orientations were examined. Multiple regression analysis was used to explore the relative strength of the goals in predicting a range of educational outcomes: general motivation, academic self-esteem, academic achievement, and use of surface, deep, and achieving learning strategies. The development of these educational outcomes was also examined. Also, 36 participants attended individual interviews. These explored their purposes of schooling, conceptions of ability, and attribution of school performance. Overall, the longitudinal and cross-sectional studies showed that the goal orientations and educational outcomes were fairly stable with medium to high mean scores. This finding is not in line with those of U.S. studies which indicate a general decline in students’ motivation during middle and high school years. Relatively speaking, there is a lack of non-Western research on the development of school motivation. Policy-makers in Hong Kong or elsewhere should not assume U.S. research applies in their context

Students' achievement motivation has been the concern of educational psychologists for the past several decades. Empirical studies on the effects of teachers' feedback provide useful information to educators on instructional practices. From these studies, educators know how to cultivate adaptive learning attitudes in students. However, a meta-analysis by Kluger & DeNisi (1996, 1998) did not find consistent effects of success and failure feedbacks in past studies. Idson and Higgins (2000) suggested that regulatory focus, a personality variable, could address these inconsistent effects. In their study, Idson & Higgins (2000) found that individuals with different orientation in regulatory focus would respond differently to success and failure feedback. The motivation of individuals with promotion focus would increase after success feedback but decrease after failure feedback. In contrast, the motivation of individuals with prevention focus would increase after failure but decrease after success feedback.
The present study attempted to identify the group of individuals who would be motivated both after success and failure feedbacks. It adopted an alternative fourfold classification of regulatory focus and extended Idson & Higgins (2000) study. Four independent groups could be derived from this classification: 1) individuals high in promotion focus but low in prevention focus; 2) individuals high in prevention focus but low in promotion focus, 3) individuals high in both prevention and promotion focuses (HH); 4) individuals low in both prevention and promotion focuses (LL). The third group of individuals was expected to be motivated after success and also failure feedbacks. They might be the people with the most adaptive motivational pattern of behaviors.
The present study adopted a 2 (promotion focus: high vs. low) x 2 (prevention focus: high vs. low) x 2 (feedback: success vs. failure) experimental design. The participants were 180 Hong Kong university students

Background: The latest report by the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), issued in 2006, indicated that Hong Kong Primary 4 Chinese students outperformed children from 45 countries and provinces in reading comprehension tests that measured their higher-order reading proficiency. However, the study gave no indication of how factors such as attribution beliefs, motivation and strategy use might contribute to reading proficiency.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the relationships between students' implicit beliefs about intelligence and ability, i.e. their 'attribution beliefs', and their motivation, metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and reading comprehension.
Sample: The subjects consisted of 120 Grade 5 Chinese students (55 boys and 65 girls) from one Hong Kong primary school that uses Chinese as the medium of instruction. The school represents a typical primary school located in a Hong Kong urban area, with most students coming from low-income families. There was a wide range of academic ability and the average age of the students was 12.2 years.
Design and methods: A quantitative approach was adopted in the research. Students were required to complete three questionnaires and two reading comprehension tests. The three questionnaires measured students' implicit beliefs about intelligence and ability, and their self-reported motivation and metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. The reading comprehension tests measured students' higher-order reading proficiency. Multiple regression analysis techniques were used to examine the relationship between students' beliefs and motivation, metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, and how they predicated students' reading comprehension.
Results: The findings showed that students' implicit beliefs about intelligence and ability, and their intrinsic motivation and metacognitive awareness of the use of reading strategies were associated with their