Are national-level research evaluation models valid, credible, useful, cost-effective, and ethical?

Are national-level research evaluation models valid, credible, useful, cost-effective, and ethical?

• Coryn, Chris L. S. Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University
• Scriven, Michael School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University

Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 4(8), 92-96, 2007

Dove Medical Press Ltd

2007

• T 教育研究
  • TB 對研究活動之研究

Program Effectiveness Comparative Education National Programs Evaluation Research Item Analysis Construct Validity Input Output Analysis Program Evaluation

• Australia
• Belgium
• Czech Republic
• Finland
• France
• Germany
• Hong Kong
• Hungary
• Ireland
• Japan
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Poland
• Sweden
• Great Britain
• United States

• 1997.7 onwards

• 未指定或無法歸類

• View Full Text 全文連結

The evaluation of government-financed research has become increasingly important in the last few decades in terms of increasing the quality of, and payoff from, the research that is done, reducing the cost of doing it, and lending public credibility to the manner in which research is funded. But there are very large differences throughout the world in the extent to which systems used promote these results. This paper briefly presents the dimensional results of a study designed to comparatively evaluate the national-level research evaluation models in sixteen countries on five merit-defining dimensions.
[Copyright of Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation is the property of Dove Medical Press Ltd .
Access via Directory of Open Access Journals: http://survey.ate.wmich.edu/jmde/index.php/jmde_1]

• 英文

期刊論文

• 15568180

https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/tc/bibs/a809cc62

2011-02-23