Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation: A comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland

Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation: A comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland

• Chan, David City University of Hong Kong
• Mok, Ka Ho City University of Hong Kong

Comparative Education, 37(1), 21-41, 2001

Routledge

2001

• R 教育政策與管理
  • RC 教育規劃及決策程序、教育體系行政
• R 教育政策與管理
  • RE 學校內部管理、學校與家長之關係
• R 教育政策與管理
  • RF 學校監管制度、問責性及視學 / 查察︰教育指標學校教育質素資源、學校私營化

Accountability Decentralization Educational Change Educational Policy Elementary Secondary Education Foreign Countries Free Enterprise System Privatization School Based Management China Hong Kong Managerialism Quality Assurance

• Hong Kong
• China

• 1980s
• 1990-1997.6
• 1997.7 onwards

• 小學教育
• 中學教育

It has been a global trend, since the 1980s, that the process of marketisation has been influential in the decision making of social policies around the world, and that this tidal wave is now crossing over to the Asia–Pacific region as well. Education policy, as one of the important social policies for many developing countries, has been influential in the forefront of national development in terms of manpower training, as well as in other arenas of economic and social developments. In this way, these countries are trying to improve the quality of their educational services so that they can be more competitive in order to cater for the demands in the international markets. One of the outcomes of this global trend is the international quality assurance movement in streamlining the educational institutions as well as in using different coping strategies to promote quality education for all concerned. For the Chinese mainland, it seems that the central government is adopting a policy of decentralisation in getting local governments to use multiple channels of resources and other methods to provide for their own educational services. Hong Kong as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, however, has adopted quite a different approach by employing the principle of managerialism in order to enhance its competitiveness in providing quality education to meet the increasing market demands. Hence, the present study is to compare and contrast the educational reforms and coping strategies that have been adopted by the socialist mainland, on the one hand, and the capitalist Hong Kong SAR, on the other hand, in order to face this new challenge of marketisation.
[Copyright of Comparative Education is the property of Routledge. Full article may be available at the publisher's website:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050060020020417]

• 英文

期刊論文

• 03050068

• 10.1080/03050060020020417

https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/tc/bibs/5454912e

2010-09-08