背景：政府建議通識科列為必修，發表了課程及評估架構建議，引起很大的爭議。然而，通識科仍歷經三次諮詢定稿。
討論焦點：從政策層面和學校層面的角度，分析通識教育科課程的適切程度。
論點：從該科的基本理念來看，通識教育科適應全球和本地發展的趨勢、切合本土教育發展、引入社會議題、聯繫不同學科的知識，以及引入較新的學與教策略。然而，其原有通識科的銜接、知識基礎的問題、課程組織的問題、考試的文化、教與學的轉變和教師的專業培訓等方面，則仍與學校層面的脈絡格格不入。
總結：不同層面的持分者有自己的關注。通識教育科的設計者，必須掌握學校層面教師的關注和實施，否則該科的理念仍無法實現。
Background: The government proposed Liberal Studies as a core subject and issued the curriculum and assessment guide, which aroused controversial debate. Nevertheless, the subject was finalized after three consultative stages.
Focus of discussion: This paper attempts to analyze, from perspectives at societal and school levels, the appropriateness of Liberal Studies curriculum.
Arguments: This paper argues that the basic rationales of this subject suit the global and local development trends, local educational development, emphasis of social issues, trends in associating knowledge from various disciplines and using new strategies of teaching and learning. However, this subject is incongruent with school level context, as it is not in line with the original Liberal Studies, knowledge-base, curriculum organization, examination culture, teaching and learning traditions and teacher professional development in Hong Kong.
Conclusion: Stakeholders in different levels have different concerns. The curriculum designers need to learn the concern and implementation of teachers in school level. Or, the ideas in this subject could not be implemented.
[Copyright of New Horizons: The Journal of Education, Hong Kong Teachers' Associationl is the property of Hong Kong Teachers' Association at http://www.hkta1934.org.hk/]