Journal Articles
Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
EdLink- Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
- Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83(0), -, 2024
- Elsevier
- 2024
-
- Hong Kong
-
- 1997.7 onwards
-
- Post-Secondary Education
- This paper evaluates the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, this mixed-methods study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing generative AI technologies. An online survey was conducted to explore the perceptions of 399 university students and 184 teachers across different disciplines in eight higher education institutions in Hong Kong concerning the use of generative AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believed generative AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argued that human teachers possess unique qualities, including critical thinking and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. Similarly, findings also emphasized the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, something which generative AI technologies cannot currently replicate. Crucially, this study further found that students value and respect their human teachers, even as generative AI becomes more prevalent. As such, the authors propose that teachers can seek to effectively integrate generative AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as their replacement. To do so, they must understand how generative AI can work well with teachers and students, avoid potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues including ethics and privacy. Recommendations are offered on how universities, teachers, and students can adopt generative AI technologies in an approach that balances the strengths of human educators with generative AI technologies. As the future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and generative AI, teachers, students, and universities should all understand and refine their unique qualities in order to effectively navigate the integration of generative AI, ensuring well-rounded and impactful learning experiences. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier.
-
- English
- Journal Articles
-
- 0191491X
- https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/bibs/adb5f9e8
- 2025-12-05
Recent Journal Articles
Students’ and teachers’ reactions to a novel school-based physical education SELF-FIT intervention A qualitative studyJournal Articles
Examining the criterion validity of two scalable, information technology-based systems designed to measure the quantity and quality of movement behaviours of children from Hong Kong primary schools: A cross-sectional validation studyJournal Articles
Perceived and actual movement skill competence: The association among primary school children in Hong KongJournal Articles
Understanding the teaching and learning of fundamental movement skills in the primary physical education setting: A qualitative studyJournal Articles
Improving fundamental movement skills in Hong Kong students through an assessment for learning intervention that emphasizes fun, mastery, and support: The A + FMS randomized controlled trial study protocolJournal Articles
Association between physical activity and fundamental movement skills in preschool-aged children: Does perceived movement skill competence mediate this relationship?Journal Articles
Preservice physical education teachers' perceived physical literacy and teaching efficacyJournal Articles
The impact of COVID-19 on preschool-aged children’s movement behaviors in Hong Kong: A longitudinal analysis of accelerometer-measured dataJournal Articles